Doors designed to last 30 minutes were destroyed in 15, say Met Police, breaking fire door regulations.
The tests were undertaken as part of the criminal investigation into the West London blaze which killed 71 last June.
Current regulations state all fire doors must be able to withstand fire for at least thirty minutes to meet the requirements set out by British Standard BS476-22. However doors of the same type used in Grenfell Tower were destroyed in just 15 minutes, half as long as certified.
Research by magazine Inside Housing showed 44 housing associations and councils are now in the process of verifying the safety of their fire doors since the findings of the investigation were released last week.
Five said they believed they may have doors from the same manufacturer of the Grenfell doors that failed the tests, Manse Masterdor, among their stock.
Barking and Dagenham council confirmed that some of their fire doors in use were Manse Masterdor FD30, the type that failed the most recent tests. A spokesperson for the East London authority said:
"The type of doors fitted were fire-resistance-tested by the company and met the expected 30-minute time to failure test."
However the council said it is considering upgrading its doors to those designed to withstand 60 minutes of fire.
10 more landlords, including Optivo, Riverside and Home Group stated they plan to undertake extra checks following last week's findings.
The Manse Masterdor FD30 doors were manufactured by Manse Masterdor in 2013. The company is no longer trading, and currently going through liquidation under a new name, having been acquired by Synseal in 2014.
According to Inside Housing, there are numerous Manse Masterdor doors fitted throughout Kensington and Chelsea Council's housing stock, which included Grenfell Tower, and they are likely installed in many other social housing blocks elsewhere.
A survivor of the tragedy called the findings "shocking", and said more must be done to make homes safe from fire risk.
Natasha Elcock, part of the bereaved and survivors' group Grenfell United, told the Independent: "It's shocking – first the cladding and insulation then the doors, who knows what else is putting people's lives at risk. It's time people's lives are taken more seriously – and that includes everyone from every walk of life.
"People's homes must be made absolutely safe for them and their children. The Government should have improved regulations after previous fires. We can't listen to any more excuses.
"Grenfell United will not stop campaigning until the lessons of Grenfell are learnt. Nothing can bring our loved ones back but we must make sure a fire like this never happens again."
Inside Housing magazine is running its own safety campaign, Never Again, urging landlords to carry out fire risk assessments following the Grenfell Tower fire.
Scotland Yard said it was unable to comment on the test results due to the ongoing investigation. In a letter sent to survivors and families, a senior investigating officer from the Metropolitan Police, Matt Bonner, outlined the findings and added: "Independent experts have advised that the risk to public safety is low, and that evidence from the suspected issue does not change this assessment."
Housing Secretary Sajid Javid said the findings were not "systemic" and risk to public safety remained low.
The government said it will provide a further update on the testing in April, after the doors have been deconstructed and the materials analysed.
Whale Fire carries out comprehensive testing for both residential and commercial buildings. For more information, email info@whalefire.co.uk or call free on 0800 772 0738.
With the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order nearly 10 years old now, the London Fire Brigade are set to investigate how successful it has been and what can be improved. There have been a number of prosecutions and the biggest concerns are:
· A significant rise of dealing with residential accommodation e.g. common parts and beyond the front door
· Enforcement of other related legislation such as Housing Act and Building Regulations.
· Guidance need to be reviewed and new guidance needed for the rise
This single piece of fire safety legislation replaced over 100 older pieces of fire legislation and now is a good time for the findings to be revealed to ensure improvements can be made where necessary.
Here at Whale Fire - we will keep you posted with the findings.
Read more here http://www.ifsecglobal.com/the-regulatory-reform-fire-safety-order-2005-insights-from-the-forthcoming-lfb-review/
We are delighted to announce that we have recently opened up a new office in London as we continue our expansion across the UK. We have a wide range of customers in London ranging from Housing Associations, Managing agents, offices, retail units and care homes amongst many more.
We work closely with our clients who include Health and Safety Managers, Facilities Managers and Office Managers. We aim to deliver a first class service and we wanted to provide a base in London to ensure we can continue to deliver the complete fire safety service across the capital and expand our team in the process.
You can contact us the address below:
Whale Fire Limited
3rd Floor
86-90 Paul Street
London
EC2A 4NE
Email: info@whalefire.co.uk
Telephone: 020 7127 6843
Whale Fire Ltd
Tel: 020 7127 6843
Mob: 07590 762397
info@whalefire.co.uk
www.whalefire.co.uk
Good question. This depends on a whole range of factors but generally the answer will be yes although of course it depends on what you need looking at. Most fire safety advisors are actually fire risk assessors whose job it is to advise on fire safety issues and provide recommendations on how to improve the fire precautions within your building.
All commercial premises and some residential properties should have a fire risk assessment carried out and for those with 5 or more employees, those findings should be recorded. For residential properties, it is the common areas that require a fire risk assessment and also Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMO). The current fire safety legislation in place is the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 which came into force on 1 October 2006. The Housing Act 2004 applies to flats themselves within blocks of flats or HMO’s and so it depends on the location you are asking about as to what type of fire safety advisor you require and under what piece of legislation. A fire safety advisors job is to provide guidance on a range of fire safety issues including:
?Means of escape provisions
Fire alarms
Fire training
Emergency lighting
Travel distances
Occupancy numbers
Disability procedures including PEEPS (Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans)
External escape routes
Fire doors and compartmentation
Flammable materials
Cooking facilities
Building work control policies
Fire extinguishers
Fire suppression systems
Emergency plans
Record Keeping
Fire Drills
Amongst many more factors – this list is by no means exhaustive.
There will always be a ‘responsible person’ within your company, building or premises that ultimately is responsible for the fire safety precautions within your building and you should find out who that person is – it may be you!
If you are asking about whether you need a fire safety advisor for your own private dwelling, you are best going directly to your Local Authority and asking them the question, they will be able to put you in touch with a local fire safety advisor who can advise you – the legislation is different for single private dwellings.
If you are in a workplace and carrying out a minor alteration within your building that may not need the advice of a fire safety advisor but if in doubt, please feel free to email your question to info@whalefire.co.uk
We are here to help and have a team of fire safety expects throughout the country to provide advice and a whole range of fire safety services – www.whalefire.co.uk